Move gopher to bottom
This commit is contained in:
parent
5d8f1872fb
commit
e9531b7245
1 changed files with 3 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,3 @@
|
|||
<div align="center">
|
||||
<img src="docs/logo.png" width="400" />
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
# evcc <!-- omit in toc -->
|
||||
|
||||
[](https://github.com/andig/evcc/actions?query=workflow%3ABuild)
|
||||
|
|
@ -11,7 +7,7 @@
|
|||
[](https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=48YVXXA7BDNC2)
|
||||
|
||||
EVCC is an extensible EV Charge Controller with PV integration implemented in [Go](2). Featured in [PV magazine](https://www.pv-magazine.de/2021/01/15/selbst-ist-der-groeoenlandhof-wallbox-ladesteuerung-selbst-gebaut/).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Features <!-- omit in toc -->
|
||||
|
||||
- simple and clean user interface
|
||||
|
|
@ -533,6 +529,8 @@ Note: to modify writable settings append `/set` to the topic for writing.
|
|||
|
||||
## Background
|
||||
|
||||
<img src="docs/logo.png" align="right" width="150" />
|
||||
|
||||
EVCC is heavily inspired by [OpenWB](1). However, in 2019, I found OpenWB's architecture slightly intimidating with everything basically global state and heavily relying on shell scripting. On the other side, especially the scripting aspect is one that contributes to [OpenWB's](1) flexibility.
|
||||
|
||||
Hence, for a simplified and stricter implementation of an EV charge controller, the design goals for EVCC were:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue